Reading through the schools of
criticism, it was easy to determine which ones I was interested in
and which ones I am not.
The psychoanalytical criticism was one
that immediately jumped out at me. Psychology was my major in school
when I was working on my associates degree, so anything pertaining to
that is always going to win favor with me. I like to know what makes
people tick and I like to pull out psychoanalytical information from
the literature I read. My goal is to eventually become a counselor,
so it's extremely important for me to brush up on my psychology
studies from time to time.
The next one that I really was
interested in was the Feminist criticism. I really love reading
pieces of literature written by feminist authors. I have so much
gratitude and respect for these authors who have helped pave the way
for my educational liberties. Recently I have read a couple of pieces
by Kate Chopin, and I have thoroughly enjoyed it. She is one of those
authors who really contributed a lot in this area.
Lastly, one of the criticisms I was
interested in was gender studies and queer theory. We live in a time
when gender roles are shifting so much and are becoming so widely
accepted, too. It is so interesting to read literature from times
when it wasn't appropriate or acceptable for men and women to
cross-pollinate their gender roles and to compare that to how it is
today. Feminine is no longer looked at as being passive and masculine
isn't looked at as being domineering. It is interesting to pick out
the subtleties, as well as the clear boundaries of the gender roles
from old literature.
I really didn't find any of them to be
uninteresting. If I had to choose one that I felt least connected
with, I would have to say structuralism and semiotics. All of these
were interesting though and it was a good refresher course to go back
and read through these.
No comments:
Post a Comment